It is always been a contentious issue that nuclear power poses disastrous menace on international tranquility despite its significant usage as affordable and environment friendly nature. Although consistency favours its usage; however, considering unmanageable wreckage and unbearable implementation cost, I believe aforementioned notion to be flawed.
Undoubtedly, atomic power has various long term benefits which cannot be ignored. The most salient one is consistent supply maintained by these energy resources. To simplify, nuclear plants are competent to provide power without any halt because of their reliable nature in comparison to other renewable resources of energy like solar radiations. As a result, it presents an excellent opportunity to cope with the shortage of non renewable resources which are at brink of extinction.
Admittedly, although nuclear energy imparts significant benefit of emitting negligible amount of nasty gases in environment but it produces considerable amount of non biodegradable waste in surroundings. To put it easily, nuclear resources of energy leave heaps of hazardous material imposing unpropitious repercussions on humanity which last for prolonged period of time. Consequently, human race becomes the victim of severe health ailments and ecological calamities.
Irrefutably, production of nuclear energy is directly linked with the final burden on authorities. To explicate it, establishment and maintenance of huge nuclear plants seek great endowments by legal bodies to ensure the safety standards. For instance, workers dealing with radioactive components need safety gears and back up plans to confront the predicted challenges. Adding more it, land filling of waste is cumbersome task because of the adversities involved in it. Therefore, authorities need to endow big chunks of money mounting unendurable burden on government exchequer.
In conclusion, ceaseless flow of energy opposes reliance on nuclear power. Owing to deleterious radioactive substances coupled with management cost, I assert above notion to be unpropitious.
Ques :- Nuclear energy is a better choice for meeting increasing demand. Do you agree or disagree?